The alarm goes off at 6am. You reach over, eyes still closed, and knock your water glass off the bedside table. It hits the floor, doesn't break, but rolls under the bed where you won't find it for three days. You stub your toe getting out of bed. The shower is cold because someone left the immersion heater off. Your train is cancelled.
By 9:15am, you're already wishing you could start over.
So here's the deal. You have a button. Small, unobtrusive, built into your wristwatch or your phone or the inside of your left forearm, wherever you like. Press it and you're back at 6am. Same day. Same alarm. Same water glass, intact, back on the bedside table. Nobody else remembers anything. Only you.
You can press it as many times as you want.
The first reset
You use it for something small. Of course you do. You spill coffee on your shirt before a meeting. Reset. You say something stupid in a conversation and the other person's face changes in that way you'll replay in your head for weeks. Reset. You miss the train by eight seconds because you went back for your umbrella and it didn't even rain. Reset.
The small stuff is addictive because the small stuff is consequence-free. Nobody knows. Nobody is hurt. You just get to have a marginally better version of Tuesday.

But the small stuff teaches you something dangerous: you can optimise. And once you know you can optimise, it's very difficult to stop.
The optimisation trap
You start planning for resets. You go into conversations deliberately, saying the wrong thing first to see how people react, then resetting and saying the right thing. You know what your boss is going to say in the 10am meeting because you've already heard it twice. You know the answer to every question because you've already got it wrong.
Your day becomes a rough draft that you edit in real time. Nobody else gets rough drafts. They're all living their first take, stumbling through, getting things wrong and right in the normal messy proportion. You're on take seven and you look brilliant.
Performance reviews improve. Conversations go better. You never say the wrong thing, never arrive late, never miss the critical email. Your colleagues think you've become sharper, more confident, more polished. You haven't. You've just had more practice at this specific Tuesday than anyone should.
The problem is that this works. It works incredibly well. And because it works, you keep doing it, and the number of resets per day starts climbing.
The relationship problem
You have a partner. You love them. You also now have an asymmetric relationship that no couple has ever faced.
You have an argument. It's a real argument, the kind where both people say things they mean but shouldn't say out loud. Your partner's face crumbles. You feel terrible. You press the button.
It's 6am again. Your partner wakes up cheerful, remembers nothing. You carry the full weight of every word they said, every expression that crossed their face. They don't know the fight happened. You do. You avoid the topic this time. The argument doesn't occur. But the things they said, the honest, unguarded things that came out in anger, you still heard them. You can't un-hear them.
Do this enough times and you end up knowing your partner better than anyone has ever known another person, in a way that is fundamentally unfair. You've seen their reactions to a thousand scenarios they don't remember. You know exactly which words make them laugh, which make them defensive, which make them cry. You know their tells. You've A/B tested your own relationship.
They think the relationship is going well. It is, from their perspective. From yours, it's a performance you've rehearsed until the spontaneity is gone.
Memory accumulation
Here's a practical problem. You remember every reset. Every version of the day. If you reset fifteen times, you've experienced fifteen Tuesdays, back to back, totalling about 240 hours of subjective time. That's ten days' worth of consciousness crammed into what the calendar says is one.
You age faster than everyone around you. Not physically, maybe. The button resets your body to its 6am state. But your mind accumulates. You're experiencing weeks of subjective time for every real day that passes. Within a year of heavy use, you might have lived three or four subjective years. Your memories are bloated, contradictory, and increasingly difficult to keep straight.
Did your colleague say that thing about the budget in version three or version six? Did the traffic accident on the roundabout happen before or after you reset, or only in certain timelines? Your brain is storing multiple versions of conversations that never happened alongside the one that "really" did, and the distinction between real and erased gets fuzzy.

At some point, you're not living a day. You're living a palimpsest, where every version bleeds through and the final text is just the one you happened to stop editing.
The moral dimension
Say you witness a car accident. A cyclist is hit. You could reset, warn the cyclist, prevent it from happening. Do you have to? If you know pressing the button saves a life, is not pressing it the same as letting someone die?
What about smaller things? You overhear that a colleague is about to be made redundant. You could reset and warn them, give them time to prepare. But the knowledge came from a timeline that no longer exists. Is it even real? Can you act on information gathered in a draft of reality?
The moral calculus becomes exhausting. Every bad thing that happens after your first reset of the day is, in theory, something you could prevent by resetting again. Once you accept that, the boundary between "things that happened to me" and "things I allowed to happen by not pressing the button" dissolves. You become responsible for everything. Not because you caused any of it, but because you could have undone it.
That's not a superpower. That's a pathology.
Groundhog Day got it right
The 1993 film understood something that the premise makes easy to miss. Phil Connors doesn't just relive the same day. He relives it enough times that he exhausts every possible version of it. He tries selfishness, manipulation, hedonism, despair. He tries dying. None of it gives the day meaning because the day has no consequences.
Consequences are what make days real. The stupid thing you said at lunch matters because you can't unsay it. The argument with your partner matters because you both have to live with it. The train you missed matters because you actually missed it, and the meeting went on without you, and the world adjusted to your absence in small irreversible ways.
A reset button doesn't give you a better life. It gives you a life where nothing counts. Every interaction is provisional. Every decision is a rehearsal. You stop taking anything seriously because nothing is final. People become characters in a simulation you can reload, and you stop treating them as real in the way that real demands, which is to say: capable of being hurt by you in ways you can't take back.
The water glass is still under the bed. Your toe still hurts. The shower is still cold. These are the things that happened, and they're yours, and the fact that you can't undo them is not a flaw in the system. It's the system working.